In this article
Say "The sound stopped during the meeting" to identify the event in which it happened. Say "The sound stopped while Maya was presenting" to describe what someone was doing at that time. Say "We had no sound for five minutes" to give the duration. Those sentences answer different questions. Knowing that a meeting lasted forty minutes does not tell you that its sound problem lasted forty minutes too. This guide uses an invented meeting log to practise a short, accurate spoken explanation. You will use the same facts in different sentence patterns, then check what a listener can reconstruct without seeing the log.
The approach
Choose the information before choosing the word
The British Council's prepositions-of-time lesson distinguishes for with a length of time from during with a noun phrase identifying when something happens. The BBC's while-versus-during lesson explains the grammatical difference between during followed by a noun phrase and while followed by a subject and verb.
For this practice, keep the subject and verb after while. You can say exactly who was doing what instead of leaving the listener to supply it.
| Information you want to give | A useful pattern | Original example |
|---|---|---|
| The surrounding event | during + noun phrase | It happened during the presentation. |
| An action happening at that time | while + subject + verb | It happened while Maya was sharing her screen. |
| The length of a state or action | for + duration | We waited for five minutes. |
Avoid "during Maya was presenting." After during, name the event: "during Maya's presentation." If you want to keep Maya was presenting, use while.
You also do not need to force all three patterns into every answer. If someone asks only how long you waited, "Five minutes" may be enough. The full sentences below are for practising the distinction.
The approach
Read the meeting log without adding a cause
Imagine these are the confirmed times in a practice exercise:
| Time | Event |
|---|---|
| 10:00 | The meeting begins. |
| 10:10 | Maya begins her presentation. |
| 10:15 | The shared audio stops. |
| 10:20 | The shared audio returns. |
| 10:30 | Maya finishes presenting. |
| 10:40 | The meeting ends. |
The meeting lasts forty minutes. Maya's presentation lasts twenty minutes. The interval without shared audio lasts five minutes.
You can report: "The shared audio stopped during the meeting, while Maya was presenting. We had no shared audio for five minutes."
The log does not say why the sound stopped. "While Maya was presenting" places the interruption in time; it does not establish that Maya caused it. If someone asks whether screen sharing caused the problem, a faithful answer is "I don't know. That's when it happened, but the log doesn't give a cause."
Keep that distinction even if you suspect an explanation. This is a language exercise about reporting the supplied facts, not diagnosing a real call.

Confidence, one phrase at a time
The approach
Do not borrow the duration of the whole event
Suppose your partner asks, "How long were you without sound?" Answering "During the meeting" leaves the duration unclear. It tells them which event contained the problem, but not whether it lasted five minutes or the whole session.
Use the interruption times: "From 10:15 to 10:20, so five minutes."
Now remove the 10:20 entry from the practice card. You know when the audio stopped, but you no longer know when it returned. You can still say that it stopped during Maya's presentation. You cannot keep the five-minute answer simply because you remember it from the first round.
Try: "It stopped at 10:15 while Maya was presenting. I don't have the time it came back."
That answer preserves the information you have and identifies the detail you need. It is better practice than filling every blank with a confident guess.
The approach
Repair the sentence while keeping the facts
If you hear yourself say "We waited during five minutes," correct the time expression: "Sorry, we waited for five minutes."
If you say "It stopped while the presentation," complete the clause: "It stopped while Maya was presenting." Alternatively, use the noun phrase with during: "It stopped during the presentation."
Focus on the intended meaning rather than repeating the entire explanation from the beginning. Your listener needs the corrected information, not a long apology for the grammar.
For a longer account with several events, the guide to telling a short story with a timeline gives a separate sequencing exercise. Here, stay with one interruption and the interval around it.
The approach
Practise with a listener who cannot see the times
Read the log once, then give your partner a spoken report without showing the table. Ask them to write down the meeting length, the interruption length and what Maya was doing when the audio stopped.
Compare their notes with the log. If they wrote forty minutes for the sound problem, clarify which duration belongs to which event: "The meeting was forty minutes long. The sound problem lasted five minutes."
For a second round, move the audio failure to 10:05 and its return to 10:08. The problem now lasts three minutes and occurs before Maya begins. "During the meeting" still fits, but "while Maya was presenting" no longer matches the facts.
End by asking your partner what remains unknown. The cause is still unspecified. Successfully reporting this exercise means preserving those limits as well as choosing the right time word.
Quick answers
Frequently asked questions
Start Speaking Today
Try Yapr free — real conversations, 47 languages, zero judgment.
Practice privately, at your pace, with zero judgment.

