In this article
To compare two options in English, say what matters for this decision, compare the relevant facts, and ask about anything that could change your choice. You can finish with a conditional recommendation: "I'd choose the studio if we can get in early enough. Let's check the opening time first." You do not always need to sound certain. Sometimes the most useful contribution is a question that stops the group choosing an option it cannot use. The fictional exercise below takes about ten minutes with a partner. It practises making a suggestion, explaining a reason and revising a recommendation. It is not an exam task or a test of your English level.
The approach
The decision: where can your group rehearse?
You and a friend need a room for a small performance rehearsal on Saturday. Six people are coming. You must start at ten in the morning, and you need thirty minutes beforehand to set up. Your total room budget is sixty dollars. Walking a shorter distance would be nice, but it is not essential.
These are the two offers. All prices and venues are invented for this activity.
| Detail | Maple room | River studio |
|---|---|---|
| Total hire price | $40 | $55 |
| Capacity | 8 people | 12 people |
| Earliest access | 9:30 a.m. | Not stated |
| Walk from the station | 15 minutes | 5 minutes |
| Tables and chairs | Included | Included |
Before speaking, identify the facts you cannot compromise on. Both rooms hold six people and cost less than sixty dollars. Both provide the furniture. Maple permits the setup time you need. River's access time is unknown.
That leaves a useful question: can the group enter River by nine thirty? Its shorter walk does not answer that question.
The approach
Make a proposal your partner can respond to
You can start simply:
"How about the Maple room? We can get in at nine thirty, so we'll have time to set up."
The British Council's making-suggestions lesson teaches short suggestion patterns, including using "How about" with an -ing form and using "Shall we" with a verb. You can apply those patterns to this situation: "How about booking Maple?" or "Shall we check River's opening time?"
Your partner does not have to agree immediately. A useful response could be:
"River is closer to the station. Could we find out when it opens?"
This gives the conversation something to resolve. Compare it with "River is better," which leaves your partner guessing what better means.
Keep the scope of each statement clear. "River has a shorter walk" is supported by the table. "River will be less tiring for everyone" adds an assumption about the people attending. You can ask what matters to them instead of deciding on their behalf.

Confidence, one phrase at a time
The approach
Ask the question that could change the choice
Take turns playing the organiser and the venue contact. The organiser should ask about the missing fact, not request information already in the table.
"We need thirty minutes to set up before a ten o'clock start. Can we enter the studio at nine thirty?"
For the first round, the venue contact gives this invented reply:
"The earliest we can let you in is nine forty-five."
Now explain what that means. River allows fifteen minutes of setup time, not thirty. Given the fixed requirements in this exercise, it does not work. Maple does.
"Then let's choose Maple. River is closer, but we wouldn't have enough setup time."
You do not need to criticise River or produce a second reason just to make the answer longer. One decisive fact is enough here.
If you did not understand the reply, ask before deciding. Our English clarification exercise gives more practice narrowing a question to the part you missed.
The approach
Change one fact and discuss it again
For the second round, change only River's earliest access to nine fifteen. Keep everything else the same.
Both venues now meet the group's stated requirements. Maple costs fifteen dollars less. River is a ten-minute shorter walk from the station and allows more setup time than required. There is no single correct choice without knowing the group's preference.
Try a question such as "Would everyone rather save the money or have the shorter walk?" Then make a recommendation based on the answer your partner actually gives.
If your partner chooses the shorter walk, you might say:
"In that case, River sounds suitable. It's still within our budget, and we can get in early enough. Shall we choose it?"
If they prefer to save the money, Maple remains a reasonable choice. Changing your recommendation after receiving new information is part of the exercise. You do not need to defend your first suggestion throughout the conversation.
The approach
Check whether the discussion worked
After each round, put the table away. Ask your partner to state the chosen venue and the reason for choosing it. If their explanation differs from yours, identify the sentence that caused the confusion and try that exchange again.
Also check whether you treated any unknown detail as a fact. Saying "River probably opens early" does not replace asking the contact. Saying "Let's book it" before your partner agrees turns your proposal into a decision they did not make.
To finish, practise a closing sentence that separates choosing from taking action: "We've chosen Maple. I'll ask whether the room is still available before I make a booking." For more on confirming who does what, see ending a work conversation with a clear next step.
You can rehearse both roles alone, but that will not show whether another person can follow your explanation. If you use Yapr or another AI conversation tool for a rehearsal, provide the invented facts and ask it to stay within them. Check its replies against your table; an invented opening time would change the task.
Quick answers
Frequently asked questions
Start Speaking Today
Try Yapr free — real conversations, 47 languages, zero judgment.
Practice privately, at your pace, with zero judgment.

