In this article
"Three years ago" normally counts back from when you are speaking. "Three years before that interview" counts back from the interview. If you repeat an old family story without keeping that reference point clear, you can accidentally move the event to a different year. Start by naming the year: "She moved in 2017." Then decide whether an expression such as ago or three years earlier helps your listener. You do not have to use a relative time expression when a date is clearer. The records below are fictional. They give you a way to practise the wording without guessing dates in your own family's history.
The approach
One event, three dates to keep separate
Suppose an aunt gave an interview in September 2020. In the recording she says, "I moved here three years ago." You listen to the recording in September 2026.
For this exercise, treat the three-year interval as exact:
| What the date refers to | Date |
|---|---|
| The move | September 2017 |
| The interview | September 2020 |
| Your retelling | September 2026 |
In the aunt's original statement, three years ago points back from 2020 to 2017. It does not point back from the day you happen to play the recording.
Here are two clear ways to report it:
"In her 2020 interview, she said she had moved there three years before."
"She moved there in September 2017, according to the interview."
The first keeps the interview as the reference point. The second gives the event date directly. In a real family account, use an exact month only if the evidence supports it. People may use "three years ago" approximately.
The approach
What changes when you say ago now?
Imagine telling someone in September 2026, "She moved there three years ago." They will normally understand September 2023, not September 2017.
To describe the exercise's 2017 move from the 2026 speaking date, you could say, "She moved there nine years ago." The event has not changed. The amount of time measured back from your current date has changed.
The EnglishClub lesson on time and place in reported speech separates time references from verb tense and shows how ago can become before in a later report. Changing the verb alone does not tell your listener which date to count back from.
Avoid leaving a sentence such as "She said she moved three years ago" to do all the work when several dates are in play. Add "in the 2020 interview," say "three years before that interview," or give the year of the move.

Confidence, one phrase at a time
The approach
A direct quotation keeps its original wording
You can quote the recording without changing ago:
"In September 2020, she said, 'I moved here three years ago.'"
The introduction identifies when the quoted words were spoken. In that quotation, ago belongs to the 2020 speaker's perspective.
If you paraphrase instead, preserve the meaning with wording appropriate to your report. Do not present a reconstructed sentence as her exact words. If all you remember is that she moved several years before the interview, say that rather than inventing a precise quotation or year.
Nor should you replace every time word automatically. The British Council's reported-speech explanation points out that a time reference can stay unchanged when the reporting context still makes it accurate. The question is what the words refer to, not whether every sentence needs a visible change.
This article focuses on time. For identifying the people in a longer report, use the separate guide to retelling a family conversation without confusing who said what.
The approach
Before needs a reference point, but it is not always a past one
In our exercise, before looks back from a past interview. That is one use, not a rule that before always means past time.
"Please call before Friday" can refer to a future deadline. "I have heard that story before" can mean before now, without giving an exact interval. Neither sentence works like the dated interview calculation above.
When practising the contrast with ago, make the reference explicit: "two years before the interview" or "two years earlier, in 2018." Once the listener knows the relevant event, a shorter "two years before" may be enough.
The challenge
Try a date check instead of a gap-fill
Read this second fictional record:
In June 2022, Arun says, "I bought the shop four years ago." You retell his account in June 2026. Again, assume exact intervals for the exercise.
Before choosing any grammar, write the year he bought the shop. Then say the same fact in three ways:
- Give the year directly.
- Count back from the interview.
- Count back from your retelling date.
Answers: "He bought the shop in June 2018." "In June 2022, he said he had bought the shop four years earlier." "He bought the shop eight years ago."
Ask a partner to identify the purchase year from each account. If one answer produces 2022, check whether you kept four years ago while silently changing the speaking date to 2026. Correct the reference point before adding more details about the shop.
Now remove the date of the recording. You only know Arun said, "I bought the shop four years ago." Can you calculate the purchase year?
No. You need the date he said it, or some other evidence. A useful reply is "Four years before the recording, but I don't know when it was recorded." That is a complete, accurate answer to the information you have.
For your own family stories, note the source date beside the event date. Keep approximate dates approximate, and separate a relative's recollection from a date confirmed by a record. A grammar exercise should not make uncertain history look certain.
Quick answers
Frequently asked questions
Start Speaking Today
Try Yapr free — real conversations, 47 languages, zero judgment.
Practice privately, at your pace, with zero judgment.

